Explaining the Processes of Marital Commitment Erosion in the Age of Social Media

Authors

    Reyhaneh Maghami * Department of Family Counseling, University of Yazd, Yazd, Iran r.maghami@yahoo.com

Keywords:

Marital commitment, social media, online infidelity, marital trust, thematic analysis, Iranian couples

Abstract

This study aimed to explain the psychological, relational, and interactional processes through which social media use contributes to the erosion of marital commitment. This qualitative study employed a thematic analysis approach. The participants were 24 married individuals living in Tehran, selected through purposive sampling with attention to gender, marriage duration, educational level, and intensity of social media use. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews, and sampling continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. After obtaining informed consent, all interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using NVivo software. Data analysis followed the phases of familiarization, initial coding, theme development, theme review, theme definition, and final reporting. To enhance trustworthiness, member checking, peer coding, analytic memoing, and an audit trail were used. Four main categories emerged from the interviews: “shifting the focus of attention from marital life to digital life,” “weakening fidelity boundaries and normalizing parallel intimacies,” “intensification of social comparison and relational dissatisfaction,” and “the cycle of surveillance, suspicion, and trust fatigue.” Participants described how unregulated social media use reduced couple communication, weakened emotional presence, blurred the boundary between ordinary interaction and emotional infidelity, and increased mistrust within the marital relationship. The findings indicate that marital commitment erosion in the age of social media is not a sudden event but a gradual and multilayered process shaped by reduced emotional presence, intensified comparison, weakened digital boundaries, and recurrent suspicion. Couple therapy and marital education programs should incorporate digital relational literacy, explicit negotiation of online fidelity boundaries, transparent communication about privacy, and trust-rebuilding strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbasi, I. S. (2019). Social media addiction in romantic relationships: Does user’s age influence vulnerability to social media infidelity? Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 277–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.10.038

Bouffard, S., Giglio, D., & Zheng, Z. (2022). Social media and romantic relationship: Excessive social media use leads to relationship conflicts, negative outcomes, and addiction via mediated pathways. Social Science Computer Review, 40(6), 1523–1541. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211013566

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Clayton, R. B. (2014). The third wheel: The impact of Twitter use on relationship infidelity and divorce. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(7), 425–430. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0570

Clayton, R. B., Nagurney, A., & Smith, J. R. (2013). Cheating, breakup, and divorce: Is Facebook use to blame? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(10), 717–720. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0424

Cravens, J. D., & Whiting, J. B. (2014). Clinical implications of internet infidelity: Where Facebook fits in. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 42(4), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2013.874211

Cravens, J. D., Leckie, K. R., & Whiting, J. B. (2013). Facebook infidelity: When poking becomes problematic. Contemporary Family Therapy, 35, 74–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-012-9231-5

de Lenne, O., Wittevronghel, L., Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2019). Romantic relationship commitment and the threat of alternatives on social media. Personal Relationships, 26(4), 680–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12299

Elphinston, R. A., & Noller, P. (2011). Time to face it! Facebook intrusion and the implications for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(11), 631–635. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0318

Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

Hertlein, K. M., & Piercy, F. P. (2006). Internet infidelity: A critical review of the literature. The Family Journal, 14(4), 366–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480706290508

Johnson, M. P., Caughlin, J. P., & Huston, T. L. (1999). The tripartite nature of marital commitment: Personal, moral, and structural reasons to stay married. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(1), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.2307/353891

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

McDaniel, B. T., Drouin, M., & Cravens, J. D. (2017). Do you have anything to hide? Infidelity-related behaviors on social media sites and marital satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.031

Nazari, A., Hosseinnia, M., & Najafi, E. (2024). Sexual satisfaction and attitude toward marital infidelity among married people in Iran: The role of social media and entertainment preferences. BMC Public Health, 24, 1773. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19073-w

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Ruggieri, S., Bonfanti, R. C., Passanisi, A., Pace, U., & Schimmenti, A. (2021). Electronic surveillance in the couple: The role of self-efficacy and commitment. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106577

Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16(2), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(80)90007-4

Utz, S., & Beukeboom, C. J. (2011). The role of social network sites in romantic relationships: Effects on jealousy and relationship happiness. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(4), 511–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01552.x

Vossler, A. (2016). Internet infidelity 10 years on: A critical review of the literature. The Family Journal, 24(4), 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480716663191

Vossler, A., & Moller, N. P. (2020). Internet affairs: Partners’ perceptions and experiences of internet infidelity. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 46(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2019.1654577

Downloads

Published

2025-08-22

Submitted

2025-07-02

Revised

2025-08-07

Accepted

2025-08-14

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Maghami, R. (2025). Explaining the Processes of Marital Commitment Erosion in the Age of Social Media. Couple Therapy Assessment, Evaluation, and Intervention, 2(3), 1-13. https://jctaei.com/index.php/jctaei/article/view/68

Similar Articles

1-10 of 79

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.