The Role of Emotional Self-Disclosure in Strengthening the Marital Bond
Keywords:
emotional self-disclosure, marital intimacy, marital satisfaction, marital bond, relationship healthAbstract
This study aimed to explain the role of emotional self-disclosure in enhancing intimacy, satisfaction, and stability in marital relationships. This qualitative review study employed thematic analysis of the relevant literature. Following a systematic search of scientific databases and application of inclusion criteria, 14 eligible articles were selected and analyzed using NVivo software version 14. Data were coded through open, axial, and selective coding procedures, and analysis continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. Results indicated that emotional self-disclosure operates at three interrelated levels: psychological, relational, and contextual. Psychologically, it promotes emotional regulation, psychological security, and individual well-being; relationally, it enhances intimacy, trust, constructive conflict resolution, and marital commitment; and contextually, it is shaped by attachment style, communication skills, family emotional climate, and cultural beliefs. Together, these dimensions play a central role in strengthening marital bonds. Emotional self-disclosure is a fundamental mechanism for marital health and relationship stability, and its development should be considered a core target of couple therapy and family-focused interventions.
Downloads
References
Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Frattaroli, J. (2006). Experimental disclosure and its moderators: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 823–865.
Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2000). The timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14-year period. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(3), 737–745.
Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (2015). The seven principles for making marriage work. Harmony Books.
Johnson, S. M. (2004). The practice of emotionally focused couple therapy. Brunner-Routledge.
Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34.
Laurenceau, J. P., Barrett, L. F., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1238–1251.
Manne, S., & Badr, H. (2008). Intimacy and relationship processes in couples’ psychosocial adaptation to cancer. Cancer, 112(11), 2541–2555.
Markman, H. J., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., Ragan, E. P., & Whitton, S. W. (2010). The premarital communication roots of marital distress and divorce. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(3), 289–298.
Mesquita, B., & Leu, J. (2007). The cultural psychology of emotions. In S. Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 734–759). Guilford Press.
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford Press.
Pennebaker, J. W., & Chung, C. K. (2011). Expressive writing: Connections to physical and mental health. Oxford Handbook of Health Psychology.
Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 367–389). Wiley.
Reis, H. T., Clark, M. S., & Holmes, J. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. Handbook of closeness and intimacy.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.