Explaining Couples’ Experiences of Blurred Emotional Boundaries in Enmeshed Families
Keywords:
Emotional boundaries, enmeshed family, couples, marital intimacy, family of origin, thematic analysisAbstract
This study aimed to explain couples’ lived experiences of blurred emotional boundaries in enmeshed families and to identify their consequences for marital intimacy, couple autonomy, and patterns of marital conflict. This qualitative study was conducted using thematic analysis. The participants were 24 married individuals living in Tehran who had experienced emotional intrusion from their family of origin or their spouse’s family into their marital life. They were selected through purposive sampling, and recruitment continued until theoretical saturation was reached. Data were collected through individual semi-structured interviews. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, repeatedly reviewed, and analyzed using NVivo software. The analytic process included familiarization with the data, initial coding, theme development, theme review, theme definition, and report writing. To enhance trustworthiness, member checking, peer review, analytic memo writing, and an audit trail were used. The analysis led to five main themes: emotional intrusion of the family of origin into the couple unit, difficulty drawing and maintaining decision-making boundaries, triangulation and hidden coalitions with parents, loyalty conflict and guilt toward the family, and erosion of marital intimacy due to the psychological presence of the extended family. Participants described their experiences through meanings such as “not having an independent psychological home,” “constant obligation to respond,” “fear of hurting parents,” and “loneliness within marriage.” The findings indicated that blurred emotional boundaries in enmeshed families weaken couples’ psychological autonomy and transform marriage from a dyadic relationship into a tense, multi-voiced relational field with unclear boundaries. Therefore, couple therapy interventions in this context should focus not only on improving couple communication but also on reconstructing emotional boundaries, strengthening differentiation of self, reducing triangulation, and reinforcing a healthy couple alliance.
Downloads
References
Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. Jason Aronson.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Coe, J. L., Davies, P. T., & Sturge-Apple, M. L. (2018). Family cohesion and enmeshment moderate associations between maternal relationship instability and children’s externalizing problems. Journal of Family Psychology, 32(3), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000346
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Haws, W. A., & Mallinckrodt, B. (1998). Separation-individuation from family of origin and marital adjustment of recently married couples. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 26(4), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926189808251108
Lampis, J., Cataudella, S., Agus, M., Busonera, A., & Skowron, E. A. (2019). Differentiation of self and dyadic adjustment in couple relationships: A dyadic analysis using the actor-partner interdependence model. Family Process, 58(3), 698–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12370
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Harvard University Press.
Minuchin, S., & Fishman, H. C. (1981). Family therapy techniques. Harvard University Press.
Muraru, A. A., & Turliuc, M. N. (2012). Family-of-origin, romantic attachment, and marital adjustment: A path analysis model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 33, 90–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.089
Olson, D. H. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22(2), 144–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.00144
Olson, D. H., Waldvogel, L., & Schlieff, M. (2019). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: An update. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 11(2), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12331
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.