Women’s Narratives of Marriage to Men with Avoidant Attachment Style
Keywords:
Avoidant attachment, narrative inquiry, married women, marital intimacy, relationship quality, emotional availabilityAbstract
This study aimed to analyze women’s narratives of being married to men with avoidant attachment style and to explain the emotional, relational, and identity-related consequences of this experience within marital life. This qualitative study was conducted using a narrative inquiry approach. Participants were 18 married women living in Tehran who reported marital experiences with husbands showing prominent features of avoidant attachment. Purposeful and snowball sampling were used, and interviews continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews lasting between 55 and 90 minutes. After obtaining informed consent, all interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded. Data analysis was conducted through narrative analysis and reflexive thematic analysis, while NVivo software was used for data management, coding organization, and retrieval. Trustworthiness was enhanced through member checking, prolonged engagement with the data, reflexive memo writing, peer review, and thick description of the research context. Analysis of the narratives showed that women’s experiences of marriage to men with avoidant attachment style were organized into five main categories: “entering the relationship with hope for emotional openness,” “the cycle of proximity-seeking and withdrawal,” “loneliness in the presence of the spouse,” “erosion of self-worth and reconstruction of feminine identity,” and “coping strategies, boundary setting, and relational reconstruction.” Participants described a form of emotional confusion in which the husband was physically present in the marriage but emotionally unavailable during moments of vulnerability, intimate conversation, marital conflict, and shared decision-making. Over time, this pattern generated feelings of rejection, doubts about personal attractiveness, decreased intimacy, emotional exhaustion, and changes in women’s communicative behaviors. The findings indicate that avoidant attachment in husbands may affect not only marital interaction quality but also women’s narratives of self, love, emotional safety, and the meaning of marriage. Attachment-based couple therapy, emotional communication training, enhancement of empathic responsiveness, and support for women in reconstructing healthy relational boundaries may help reduce the psychological and relational consequences of this pattern.
Downloads
References
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. N. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226
Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment (2nd ed.). Basic Books. Original work published 1969.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). Guilford Press.
Bretaña, I., Alonso-Arbiol, I., & Gómez, J. (2022). Avoidant attachment, withdrawal–aggression conflict pattern, and relationship satisfaction: A dyadic approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 780741. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.780741
Butzer, B., & Campbell, L. (2008). Adult attachment, sexual satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction: A study of married couples. Personal Relationships, 15(1), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00189.x
Candel, O. S., & Turliuc, M. N. (2019). Insecure attachment and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis of actor and partner associations. Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.04.037
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.
Collins, N. L., & Feeney, B. C. (2000). A safe haven: An attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1053–1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1053
Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 644–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.644
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
Johnson, S. M. (2004). The practice of emotionally focused couple therapy: Creating connection (2nd ed.). Brunner-Routledge.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Pietromonaco, P. R., & Barrett, L. F. (2000). The internal working models concept: What do we really know about the self in relation to others? Review of General Psychology, 4(2), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.4.2.155
Reis, H. T., Clark, M. S., & Holmes, J. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In D. Mashek & A. Aron (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201–225). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.