A Phenomenological Analysis of the Lived Experiences of Couples with Severe Class and Cultural Differences in Marriage

Authors

    Peyman Rostami-Far Department of Family Counseling, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
    Hamidreza Noori Department of Health Psychology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
    Narges Sharifi Department of Health Psychology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

Class difference, cultural difference, marriage, lived experience, phenomenology, couples, Tehran

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the lived experiences of couples whose marriages were shaped by severe class and cultural differences. This qualitative study was conducted using a descriptive phenomenological design. The participants consisted of 20 married individuals, including 10 women and 10 men, living in Tehran, Iran, who had been married for at least three years and perceived their relationship as marked by substantial differences in social class, family background, lifestyle, cultural capital, or value systems. Participants were selected through purposive sampling based on the richness of their experiences, and recruitment continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews. The interviews were audio-recorded with participants’ consent, transcribed verbatim, repeatedly reviewed, and analyzed using phenomenological coding procedures with the support of NVivo software. To enhance trustworthiness, member checking, prolonged engagement with the data, analytical memoing, peer debriefing, and an audit trail were employed. Data analysis yielded four main categories: class and cultural shock after entering married life; exhausting negotiation over lifestyle, consumption, and family relations; redefinition of power, status, and couple identity; and transition from the duality of “my family/your family” toward the construction of a shared world. Participants experienced class and cultural differences not merely as economic inequality but as incompatibilities in emotional language, interaction rituals, family expectations, symbolic meanings of honor and respectability, consumption patterns, conflict resolution styles, and perceptions of social status. However, couples who moved beyond comparison, shame, and mutual devaluation were able to transform difference into a source of learning, flexibility, and relational growth. Severe class and cultural differences in marriage become a persistent source of relational crisis when they are accompanied by shame, comparison, family interference, power asymmetry, and lack of open dialogue. Nevertheless, when couples establish healthy boundaries, maintain mutual respect, and reconstruct a shared marital narrative, such differences can become a pathway toward relational resilience, expanded lifeworlds, and a flexible couple identity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmadi, K., Nabipoor Ashrafi, S. M., Kimiaee, S. A., & Afzali, M. H. (2015). Marital quality trajectory among Iranian married individuals. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 44(9), 1240–1247.

Blossfeld, H.-P., & Timm, A. (Eds.). (2003). Who marries whom? Educational systems as marriage markets in modern societies. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Harvard University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.

Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48–71). Oxford University Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Donovan, S. (2004). Stress and coping techniques in successful intercultural marriages. Cross-Cultural Research, 38(3), 256–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397104264277

Emami, L., Rasouli, M., Zahrakar, K., & Gramipour, M. (2025). From differences to co-becoming: A phenomenological analysis of the lived experience of couple identity in intercultural marriages. Applied Psychology, 19(4), 184–212. https://doi.org/10.48308/apsy.2025.241376.1891

Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3

Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 395–421. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.395

Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107

Lavner, J. A., Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2016). Does couples’ communication predict marital satisfaction, or does marital satisfaction predict communication? Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(3), 680–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12301

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Morrow, R., Rodriguez, A., & King, N. (2015). Colaizzi’s descriptive phenomenological method. The Psychologist, 28(8), 643–644.

Overall, N. C., & McNulty, J. K. (2017). What type of communication during conflict is beneficial for intimate relationships? Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.002

Schwartz, C. R. (2013). Trends and variation in assortative mating: Causes and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145544

Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. SAGE Publications.

Smits, J., Ultee, W., & Lammers, J. (1998). Educational homogamy in 65 countries: An explanation of differences in openness using country-level explanatory variables. American Sociological Review, 63(2), 264–285. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657327

Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research: A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. State University of New York Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-20

Submitted

2025-12-31

Revised

2026-02-05

Accepted

2026-02-12

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Rostami-Far, P., Noori, H., & Sharifi, N. (2026). A Phenomenological Analysis of the Lived Experiences of Couples with Severe Class and Cultural Differences in Marriage. Couple Therapy Assessment, Evaluation, and Intervention, 2(6), 1-12. https://jctaei.com/index.php/jctaei/article/view/47

Similar Articles

1-10 of 75

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.